I totally agree with the notion that an IMO should always release an agent.
However, are there every any circumstances that would make it unreasonable to release an agent?
For example, would you release an agent with company "A", if their debt rolled up to you with company "B"? Or would you ensure that the agent was at least on a payment plan before releasing from company "A"?
The term upfront release "in writing" gets thrown around here alot. Does that mean you get a release signed before you begin contracting? If so, are IMO's on this board doing that? Or does an agent request
Source of insurance-forums.net
However, are there every any circumstances that would make it unreasonable to release an agent?
For example, would you release an agent with company "A", if their debt rolled up to you with company "B"? Or would you ensure that the agent was at least on a payment plan before releasing from company "A"?
The term upfront release "in writing" gets thrown around here alot. Does that mean you get a release signed before you begin contracting? If so, are IMO's on this board doing that? Or does an agent request
Comments
Post a Comment