Everyone knows that the purpose of Individual Mandate was to add healthy risks to the mix of anticipated adverse risks due to the lack of pre-existing conditions. Would ACA have gone down better if more people who had pre-ACA policies had been allowed to KEEP their existing policies?, thereby preserving their CHOICE. I don't understand why those responsible people were FORCED to buy a new policy that was often more expensive, albeit with richer benefits. I still say that consumers should have the right to exclude certain benefits such as maternity, children's dental and mental if they don't
Content of insurance-forums.net
Comments
Post a Comment