Insurance agent 1 splits and advances commissions to Non Appointed Insurance agent 2-Me for writing the business.
Client stops paying on policy because Insurance Agent 2-Me gets client into a better product with my own appointed carrier. Insurance agent 1 screams Churn.
I declare acting in best interest for client trumps product everyday.
Insurance agent 1 wants repayment and threatens legal collection efforts.
Does Insurance agent #1 have a valid debt to collect on in the state of Texas for inherently having me bird dog the deal or was the split illegal in the first place?
Source of insurance-forums.net
Client stops paying on policy because Insurance Agent 2-Me gets client into a better product with my own appointed carrier. Insurance agent 1 screams Churn.
I declare acting in best interest for client trumps product everyday.
Insurance agent 1 wants repayment and threatens legal collection efforts.
Does Insurance agent #1 have a valid debt to collect on in the state of Texas for inherently having me bird dog the deal or was the split illegal in the first place?
Comments
Post a Comment