Does this Make Sense

I was looking at different scenarios.....does this make sense.

I learned or was shown that in order to maximize retirement income out of a whole life policy, that you should first take out basis and then loans.

However I realize that this strategedy actually reduces death benefit faster and reduces cash value more than just taking loans.

Assuming you have had to compound say 20 years in a limited pay policy.....it would seem that the better maximization strategedy would be to just take loans, rather than surrender basis.

Thoughts ?
Source of insurance-forums.net

Comments